Commentary - OnLine

Commentary

Beyond Fear and Loathing

By Ashleigh Luthman-Hackett (June 2, 2005)

 

Like Mark Twain, with his revolutionized free-flow style of writing, the notorious Hunter S. Thompson, inventor of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1971), possessed a free lance and innovative writing style, Gonzo. Gonzo was a unique combination of journalism, personal memoir mixed with invention and “wild rhetoric,” inspired by the “bizarre exuberance of a young civilization”. It is, in itself, hardly a category, but more the character of the man himself, who “died as he lived.”

Tom Wolfe, author and fellow “acid head,” had experiences in the presence of Thompson several times throughout his life. “Hunter’s life, like his work, was one long barbaric yawp, to use Whitman’s tests of the drug-fueled freedom from and mockery of all conventional proprieties that began in the 1960’s,” wrote Wolfe.

Thompson was an extremist in every aspect except for moderation. The concept and control of moderation, which is embedded as a respected principle in society that one should acquire at one point, was not a tactic used by Thompson. Extremity in his case consisted of daily dosages of drug intakes, ranging from mescaline to cocaine to ether. These things, shunned by the Machine (a Gonzo word for the Government/Society) were no doubt components of his eccentric self, but in my opinion, extremism—at least in certain ways--is a quality to consider admirable.

 

Living outside of the box, as Thompson lived his life, has been an appealing idea and somewhat reality for me. Thompson tackled a unique aspect of journalism, created his own, customized strings of words, traveled and wallowed in spontaneity; he mastered his idea of life and the way it should be lived. In his case, there was no “way,” and he possessed no general ambition for direction or motive. His death, unfortunate and sad, was both planned and expected, for he had planned to kill himself whenever he felt the need to conclude his life in one abrupt halt.

Perhaps my life would rest more contentedly in the hands of spontaneity rather than a planned and well- beaten trail. In this world, people are driven perpetually by schedule and by the hands of a clock, left with no time for spontaneity or the prospect of not knowing. Maybe my own satisfaction could be trained to answer to random events as well as planned events and not seeing what it was I wasn’t able to get done as a failure. Thompson possessed somewhat of an acquired taste for life. “I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me.” He once said.

In writing this, I do not imply at all to advocate drugs and that sort of lifestyle or impose it; only to say that the manner in which this man lived touched a spot of familiarity and comfort in me and I realized that it was not the substance abuse that was admirable but the eccentric, impulsive creature that found significance where it is not usually found by most people.

“No man is so foolish but he may sometimes give another good counsel, and no man so wise that he may not easily err if he takes no other counsel than his own. He that is taught only by himself has a fool for a master,” wrote Thompson. One of the many slurs of wisdom that he spouted during his life and this piece in particular, I think is most significant. Considered the ideal fool by some, he mastered the counseling of his own mind, with his own words, and on his own terms.



Tell us what you think.  E-mail lassogmhs@hotmail.com